ÉèΪÊ×Ò³ | ¼ÓÈëÊÕ²Ø | ÊÖ»ú°æ | ÈçÀ´²ØÍø£º³«µ¼ÕýÖªÕý¼ûÕýÐÞÕýÐеÄѧ·ðÃÅ»§ÍøÕ¾

ÈÈËÑ£º¡¡Èý³ËÆÐÌá ¡¡Äù˜„ ¡¡ÎòµÀ ¡¡¹«°¸ ¡¡Ê®ÐÅ ¡¡ÆÐÌá

µ±Ç°Î»ÖãºÈçÀ´²ØÍø>µç×Ó±¨>Õý¾õµç×Ó±¨>µÚ131ÆÚ>

ìéÒ³µÈ

[µÚ131ÆÚ]  ·¢±íʱ¼ä£º 2018-08-26 01:24 µã»÷: [·Å´ó×ÖÌåÕý³£ËõС] ¹Ø±Õ
ÊÀ×ð£¡ÓжþÖÖÈçÀ´²Ø¿ÕÖÇ¡£ÊÀ×𣡿ÕÈçÀ´²ØÈôÀë¡¢ÈôÍÑ¡¢ÈôÒìÒ»Çз³Äղء£ÊÀ×𣡲»¿ÕÈçÀ´²Ø£¬¹ýÓÚºãɳ²»Àë¡¢²»ÍÑ¡¢²»Ò첻˼Òé·ð·¨¡£
¡¶Ê¤ôNʦ×ÓºðÒ»³Ë´ó·½±ã·½¹ã¾­¡·
----------------------------------------------------------
World-Honored One! There are two kinds of wisdom ofemptiness with reference to the Tath¨¡gatagarbha.World-Honored One! The Tath¨¡gatagarbha that is emptyis separate from, free from, and distinct from all thestores of afflictions. World-Honored One! TheTath¨¡gatagarbha that is not empty is not separate from,not free from, and not distinct from the inconceivableBuddha-dharmas more numerous than the sands of theGanges River.
The Lion’s Roar of Queen Srimala, the Single-VehicleGreat Expedience, the Corrective and Extensive Sutra[Srimaladevi Simhanada Sutra]
Translation of the scriptural passage was adapted from Diana Paul’srendition, p.37. [Paul, D. (2004). The Sutra of Queen Sr¨©m¨¡l¨¡ of the Lion’s Roar. Berkeley, CA: Numata Center for BuddhistTranslation and Research.]
----------------------------------------------------------
 
¿Õ£¬ÓÐÁ½¸öµÀÀí£ºÒ»¸öÊÇ¿ÕÐÔ£¬Ò»¸öÊÇ¿ÕÏà¡£¿ÕÐÔ£¬½²µÄ¾ÍÊDz»¿ÕµÄÈçÀ´²Ø£¬ÒòΪÕâ¸ö¿ÕȷʵÓÐÕæʵÐÔ£¬²»ÊÇÔµÆðÐÔ¿Õ£¬ËùÒÔ³ÆΪ²»¿ÕÈçÀ´²Ø£»ÔµÆðÐÔ¿ÕÊÇûÓÐÕæʵÐԵģ¬¿ÉÊÇÈçÀ´²ØÕâ¸ö¿Õ£¬ÓÐÕæʵÐÔ£¬ËùÒÔ²»ÄÜ˵µkÊÇÔµÆðÐԿյĿÕÎÞ¡£ÁíÍâÒ»¸ö¿ÕÊÇÖ¸¿ÕÏ࣬ÔÌ´¦½çµÈ·¨¶¼ÊÇÆäÐÔÎÞ³£¹Ê¿Õ£¬ÎÞ³£¿Õ¾ÍÒ»¶¨ÓÐÉúסÒìÃðµÄ·¨Ïà´æÔÚ£»¼ÈÈ»ÓÐÉúסÒìÃðµÄ·¨Ïà´æÔÚ£¬ÓÐÉúÔò±ØÓÐÃð£¬ÄǾͽÐ×÷¿ÕÏ࣬¶øÕâ¸ö¿ÕÏàÈ´ÈÔÈ»ÊǸ½ÊôÓÚÈçÀ´²Ø£»Õâ¸ö¿ÕÏ࣬¾Í½Ð×÷¿ÕÈçÀ´²Ø¡£
¡¶Ê¤ôN¾­½²¼Ç¡·µÚËļ­£¬Ò³261-262
----------------------------------------------------------
In regard to “emptiness,” there are two distinct concepts:“emptiness qua nature” and “emptiness qua characteristic.”Emptiness qua nature refers to the “Tath¨¡gatagarbha that isnot empty.” This emptiness is a real essence, not theemptiness in the teaching that “all dependently arisenphenomena are empty of an intrinsic nature.” That is why this “emptiness qua nature” refers to “the Tath¨¡gatagarbhathat is not empty.” In other words, the teaching that “alldependently arisen phenomena are empty of an intrinsic nature” describes the absence of a real essence inconditioned phenomena, whereas the “emptiness that is theTath¨¡gatagarbha” has a real essence. Therefore, this “emptiness” of real essence cannot be equated with the“emptiness” that characterizes the teaching that “alldependently arisen phenomena are empty of an intrinsic nature.” The second concept of emptiness is “emptinessqua characteristic.” Dependently arisen phenomena suchas the aggregates (skandhas), sense-fields (¨¡yatanas), elements (dh¨¡tus), and so forth are all subject toimpermanence. Because they are subject to impermanence,they consistently exhibit the Dharma characteristics ofarising, abiding, changing, and extinction—with arisingalways followed by extinction; hence they are delineatedas “emptiness qua characteristic.” Since this “emptiness qua characteristic” is nevertheless attributed to theTath¨¡gatagarbha, it is called “the Tath¨¡gatagarbha that isempty.”
A Discourse on the Srimaladevi Simhanada Sutra,Vol. 4, pp. 261-262 
±¾ÎıêÇ©£º ±¾ÎĹؼü×Ö£ºìéÒ³,ÊÀ×ð,¶þÖÖ,ÈçÀ´,¿ÕÖÇ,ÈôÀë,ÈôÍÑ,ÈôÒì,Ò»ÇÐ,·³ÄÕ,
Ïà¹ØÔĶÁ
ÍƼöÎÄÕÂ
Ô¸ËùÓй¦µÂ»ØÏò£º

×Ô¹éÒÀ·ð£¬µ±Ô¸ÖÚÉú£¬Ìå½â´óµÀ£¬·¢ÎÞÉÏÐÄ£»×Ô¹éÒÀ·¨£¬µ±Ô¸ÖÚÉú£¬ÉîÈë¾­²Ø£¬ÖÇ»ÛÈ纣£»×Ô¹éÒÀÉ®£¬µ±Ô¸ÖÚÉú£¬Í³Àí´óÖÚ£¬Ò»ÇÐÎÞ°­¡£

Ô¸ÒԴ˹¦µÂ£¬×¯ÑÏ·ð¾»ÍÁ£»Éϱ¨ËÄÖض÷£¬Ï¼ÃÈýÍ¿¿à£»ËùÓмûÎÅÕߣ¬Ï¤·¢ÆÐÌáÐÄ£»¾¡´ËÒ»±¨Éí£¬Í¬Éú¼«ÀÖ¹ú¡£

Copyright © 2015-2018 ÈçÀ´²Ø www.rulaizang.cn °æȨËùÓÐ
¾©ICP±¸15020842ºÅ